Theos-Talk Archives (November 1996 Message tl00050)

In message <Pine.BSD/.3.91.961102073218.504C-100000@matrix.eden.com>,
"m.k. ramadoss" <ramadoss@eden.com> writes
>       The production of the letters has been discussed rather
>extensively and all the evidence points out to  the authenticity of the
>letters.

Errr ... how about:

The production of the letters has been discussed rather
extensively and much of the evidence points out to the non-authenticity
of the letters.  Many who have studied them suspect the direct hand of
HPB in the production of certainly some of them.

If you are going to make sweeping generalisations like "all the evidence
points to, etc." then you had better produce "all the evidence" and then
follow it up with a seriously reasoned case for the authenticity of the
letters being a fact.

Alan
---------
THEOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL: Ancient Wisdom for a New Age:
http://www.nellie2.demon.co.uk/
E-mail: TINT@nellie2.demon.co.uk