theos-l

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: why reduction in numbers

May 23, 1996 10:54 AM
by Joanne Greig


I feel the same as Anne, though I'm still getting theos-roots, which also picks
up a few cross-posts from the other theos lists.  However I often
delete messages without reading them, especially those of a political character
or the "one-liners".  This stuff was really pouring in at one stage, but
unfortunately to my mind there was little of value in it. I find the esoteric
astrology list I subscribe to more interesting in terms of discussing
principles,
 putting them into practice, and also openness to others' ideas, and I feel more
 inclined to send messages when I get time.  I wasn't going to say anything as I
 don't like to be too negative and have a "live and let live" attitude, but
since
 someone asked...

ASTREA

At 09:13 23/05/96 -0400, you wrote:
>
>DHC:
>>Is this a seasonal variation?  Theos-l has lost 16 subscribers in the last 5
>>months.
>
>I left earlier this year for the following reasons:
>1. Sheer volume of daily messages.
>2. Lack of interest in subject matter.
>3.  Didn't feel I was learning anything.
>
>While I feel it's important to have a mailing list that is independent and not
>censured, it is even more important that the list doesn't lapse into bickering
>and jokes.  B&J are always good for spice, but who wants to eat spice cake all
>day?
>
>- Ann E. Bermingham
>
>
>


[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application