Theos-Talk Archives (May 1996 Message tl00179)

In message <960503104353_105818786@emout08.mail.aol.com>,
Coherence@aol.com writes
>It seems naive to think that HPB was not giving out a body of doctrines.
> Now, how each of us understands those and works with them is another matter.
> But I would maintain that there is a "theosophical doctrine".

.. and so would I.  Maybe Alexis was having a bad day?  I chose not to
take up his inclusion of my name in the post you quoted, owing in part
to matters of language - at least one of my theosophical kabalist
associates is a latter-day *genuine* pharisee, a "parush."  The word was
at one time used in a pejorative sense in English, and a number of
pejoratives have been used by different people on the list of late, as
in one subscriber calling another "deluded" as a statement of fact
rather than a supported opinion.  For all of our sakes, please stay and
keep your contributions coming.

Sincerely,

Alan
---------
THEOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL:
Ancient Wisdom for a New Age
TI@nellie2.demon.co.uk
http://www.garlic.com/~rdon/TI.html