theos-l

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Is this a thesophical list

May 01, 1996 10:26 AM
by Kim Poulsen


Rich:
>For whatever reason -- probably because of having attended a really
wonderful
>meeting tonight with lots of different kinds of spiritual seekers -- I am
>re-claiming that part of myself which knows that all students of Theosophy
>(whether CWL, AAB, Judge, Tingley, Purucker, Steiner, whatever) have been
>growing out of the same foundation, and each deserve respect for what
>they've tried to accomplish.

 Very well put, Rich. I am sorry to answer you with (almost) an one-liner
:-)  , but this attitude seems very important with only possibly 50.000
theosophists in all. Of course an idea can always be contested, but (to
stay out of sensitive theosophical subjects) to hold the opinion that
Nagarjuna was mistaken in his views about everythings dependence upon
svabhavat (as HPB did), is certainly not the same as refuting the fact that
he was a magnificent philosopher.
   You seem to have surfaced from the fogs of war in a greatly positive
spirit!

In friendship,

Kim

In friendship,

Kim



[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application