Theos-Talk Archives (April 1996 Message tl01322)

In message <199604280458.VAA00405@web.azstarnet.com>, Blavatsky
Foundation <blafoun@AZStarNet.com> writes
> Do you have to be a member of a T.S. to subscribe to
>this list?  I don't think so.

Certainly not!
>
>And is the new Theosophy International the same as Theos-l?  I hope not!

Certainly not!  There *is* a risk that newcomers to the list(s) might
erroneously suppose this, which is why I for one encourage TI members to
post TI-related matters to theos-buds - but it's a free world, and a
fair proportion of list subscribers belong to TI, and a fair proportion
also belong to the T.S. in America.  So ... matters relating to these
and other organisations will inevitably be discussed here.

I think your suggestion of using theos-tech is a good one, if you can
get people to use it in the way you have in mind.  For many, it would be
a real boon not having to put up with some of our inanities and sad
attempts at humor.  However, you would also run the risk of theos-l
subscribers sending the one-liner to listproc@vnet.net "subscribe theos-
tech <name>" - and you would end up no better off.

Hard life, Dan, hard life :-)

Fraternally,

Alan
---------
THEOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL:
Ancient Wisdom for a New Age
TI@nellie2.demon.co.uk
http://www.garlic.com/~rdon/TI.html