Theos-Talk Archives (April 1996 Message tl00208)

Alan,
It's ok ewith me, the way you want it.
Liesel


>At 06:35 PM 4/10/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>In message <199604101834.OAA08179@ultra1.dreamscape.com>, "liesel f.
>>deutsch" <liesel@dreamscape.com> writes
>>>Chuck,
>>>
>>>Nobody's answering you, but I think you have a point there. We don't want to
>>>stand there "we're free & you aren't, nja, nja, njaaa!"
>>>
>>>Liesel
>>>Member TI, TSA, TS in Canadam HR
>>>........................................................................
>>
>>I have answered Chuck ... and we're not saying that.  The importance of
>>the "free" part of the statement is as much a declaration of ethos, of
>>setting a standard for the future.  We *are* free and we want to *stay*
>>free.  Nowhere in the TI statement do we denigrate *any* other
>>theosophical setups - on the contrary, we hope to be of service *in
>>amity* with them.
>>
>>If they seek to denigrate us, or deprive their members of any freedoms,
>>the problems arising, if any, are theirs, not ours.  I hope that TI is
>>something that will be looking forward, not backwards.  Let us learn
>>from the mistakes of the past without parading them triumphantly as our
>>raison d'etre.  Our raison d'etre is to promote the three objects in the
>>best way we know how - and to seek and find even better ways by working
>>together freely and honestly.  Yep.
>>
>>Alan
>>---------
>>THEOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL:
>>Ancient Wisdom for a New Age
>>TI@nellie2.demon.co.uk
>>
>>Alan:
>Hear! Hear! Huzzah for you! Well put, and I agree with evey word.
>
>alexis
>
>
>