Theos-Talk Archives (February 1996 Message tl00012)

At 09:18 PM 2/4/96 -0500, you wrote:
>At 02:34 PM 2/4/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>In message <960204113439_135497649@emout09.mail.aol.com>, CAJI@aol.com
>>writes
>>>
>>>Please remove the following addresses from all of your blind mailing lists
>>>immediately.
>>>
>>>caji@pobox.com
>>>caji@aol.com
>>>
>>>Thank you,
>>>caji
>>
>>I don't know what a "blind" mailing address is!  If you post to any of
>>the theosophy lists @vnet.net, then you make your e-mail address known
>>to my system as a matter of course.  In other words, if you publish it,
>>then all subscribers know it.  TI does not have any facility for
>>automating mail shots - perhaps there is some confusion here?
>>
>>I am copying this message to John Mead, who administers the theosophy
>>lists, in the hope that he can shed some light on your problem, which I
>>do not understand.
>>
>>AB
>>---------
>>THEOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL:
>>Ancient Wisdom for a New Age
>>
>>I can easily understand why someone would want to use a pseudonym on an
>alt.sex board but on aTheosophical Board? What's to be secretive about? It's
>hardly subversive, it's hardly socially unacceptable, so why would anyone
>need a "blind listing"?
>
>alexis dolgorukii, member T.I.
>aetheling, gad-fly
>
>

I got a listing of subscribers from theos-buds and this person is not in it.
I also got a msg from him stating that he is not getting any msgs from
theos-buds. so the problem is fixed.

..doss