Theos-Talk Archives (March 1995 Message tl00248)

According to John Mead:


> > John M: <could someone explain that if Paul Johnson's work is
> > incorrect, then what is the correct interpretation of the
> > Masters??>
> >
> jerry --
>
> you see my point correctly.  The critics have an easy time
> attacking Paul since he has spent so much effort in writing out
> his ideas.  (several hundreds of pages)
>
> the others have not a word to say, other than what is not
> correct.
>
> So -- where are the critic's alternatives?? can they send out any
> statements/arguements which we can judge?? they seem mysteriously
> silent.  Perhaps their opinion is even less well-founded than
> Paul's ??
>
> peace --
>
> john e. m.
> jem@vnet.net

I have some thoughts on all this which I will write and save,
but rather than forward to all subscribers, I'll just send to
John and Jerry, and upon request to anyone who's interested.

Namaste.
Paul